A mother of 2 in her later 30’s who is bothered by a a deflated appearance of her breasts after pregnancy. She wears a 36 B and was a 38 C when breast feeding, She liked this size. She is 5’ 6” and 152 lbs and is shown before and again, 6 weeks after bilateral partial sub-pectoral
( below the muscle) placement of Ideal Structured Saline Implants 405-455 filled to 425
Discussion: she wanted a full but still natural appearing result. Her breast base width is 13.27 on her right and 13.21 on her left. Her nipple to fold on stretch is 9 cm. So a 13 cm base implant would not give her excessive superior pole convexity ( bulging of the upper breast) and as long as the base width of the implant is less than the width of her breast it should not look overly like an implant. The base width of the Ideal implant is 12-11.9 from minimum to maximum recommended fill and we add 3 mm to that to get the comparable implant width because of the curved base of the Ideal implant. I like to undersize the Ideal implants slightly to give a more natural appearance. I find that I can go a little larger with the silicone gel for patients that want the maximum volume but still a natural appearance. So the Ideal implant has an empty implant volume of 60 cc, the back chamber is filled to 235 cc and together with the front chamber fill of 130 cc we get the final volume of 425 cc.
Her photos are at just 6 weeks. I find that it takes 4-5 months for the Ideal implants to settle completely to the final result. The breasts are “sisters and not twins” and her right breast is slightly larger before and after surgery-because the left breast is slightly smaller we see a little more fullness of the upper breast on her left at 6 weeks- this will typically settle over the next vew months as the breasts stretch slighty to accommodate the implants.
Cosmetic & Plastic Surgery Specialist
"I treat my patients like I would treat
- Jonathan D. Hall, MD, FACSmembers of my own family."
Schedule Consultation